How to Read “In a group of three travelers, one is a beggar”
Sannin tabi no hitori kojiki
Meaning of “In a group of three travelers, one is a beggar”
“In a group of three travelers, one is a beggar” means that when three people travel together, one of them will inevitably face financial hardship. This proverb points out the economic imbalance that occurs in the special situation of traveling.
This proverb is used to warn about the difficulty of maintaining equal economic status when multiple people start something together. It suggests that even if everyone starts under the same conditions, economic gaps tend to emerge along the way.
This applies not just to travel, but also to joint business ventures and long-term cooperative relationships.
Even today, this saying offers valuable insight when friends plan trips or start businesses together. It captures a reality of human relationships: the subtle dynamics of three people inevitably create economic imbalance.
Differences in spending pace, money management attitudes, and ability to handle unexpected expenses naturally lead to financial inequality.
Origin and Etymology
The exact literary origin of this proverb is unclear, but it likely emerged from the realities of travel during the Edo period. Travel back then was not as casual as today. It involved long, difficult journeys.
The number three is significant here. It seems to have been considered the ideal minimum for traveling. One person alone would feel anxious. Two people might deadlock when opinions clash. Four or more would slow down the group.
But three people can help each other and make decisions by majority vote. So why would one become a beggar?
This reflects the economic reality of travel. When three people travel, they share costs for lodging and meals. But unexpected expenses can pile up along the way. Someone might fall ill.
The three travelers might not have equal financial resources from the start. Money management differences often surface during the journey. One might be frugal, another a spendthrift, and the third somewhere in between.
As a result, the person with the weakest economic power or the one who faces the most misfortune ends up financially struggling by journey’s end. This observation likely gave birth to this saying.
Usage Examples
- Three of us started a company, and eventually one person went through a period without getting paid. It’s exactly like “In a group of three travelers, one is a beggar.”
- We’re planning a graduation trip with three people, but they say “In a group of three travelers, one is a beggar,” so we need to manage our money carefully.
Universal Wisdom
“In a group of three travelers, one is a beggar” conveys a harsh but realistic truth: economic imbalance in human relationships is inevitable. Why specifically three people? Because this number requires the most delicate balance in relationships.
With two people, there’s a conscious effort to maintain equality. With four or more, if someone struggles financially, the others can support them together. But three creates a dynamic where a two-against-one structure easily forms.
The possibility of one person being left behind is highest with three.
This proverb recognizes a cold fact: human economic power and luck are never equal. Even starting under identical conditions, differences inevitably emerge. These come from varying money management attitudes, ability to handle unexpected expenses, or simple good or bad luck.
With three people, these differences become most visible.
Looking deeper, this proverb also reflects human psychology. If two of the three have financial comfort, they naturally grow closer. The struggling one feels excluded. Economic disparity directly influences the power dynamics of relationships.
Our ancestors expressed this unavoidable reality of human society through the concrete scenario of travel. It serves as both a warning and life wisdom.
When AI Hears This
Three-person groups have mathematical instability built into them. In game theory, when analyzing situations where three people cooperate and share benefits, there’s always a moment when “two team up to betray one” becomes the most advantageous choice.
For example, rather than splitting travel costs three ways equally, if two people collude to make one person bear more, those two benefit. This structure is the problem.
What makes it worse is that this two-person alliance isn’t fixed. Even if A and B team up today to exclude C, tomorrow it might be more advantageous for B and C to team up and exclude A.
The alliance constantly shifts, and everyone lives with the anxiety that “I might be the next target.” Game theory calls this “a state where no core (stable solution) exists.” There’s no mathematically stable distribution method.
In contrast, two or four people create stability. With two, only an equal relationship exists. With four, a two-versus-two balance can be maintained. But with three, an asymmetric two-versus-one always emerges, and the temptation to betray never disappears.
This repetition destroys trust, and ultimately cooperation itself breaks down.
When this proverb says “one is a beggar,” it points to a situation where everyone betrays each other repeatedly. As a result, no one cooperates anymore, and all three end up with the worst outcome.
The property of odd numbers makes human relationships mathematically unstable. Our ancestors recognized this law through experience.
Lessons for Today
This proverb teaches modern people the importance of financial preparation and consideration when doing things together. Whether it’s traveling with friends, starting a joint business, or sharing an apartment, we must recognize that economic gaps will inevitably emerge in long-term relationships.
What matters is not feeling ashamed of these gaps or blaming others for them. Differences in economic power arise not just from lack of effort or ability, but also from luck and circumstances.
If three people start something together, they should build a relationship of mutual support from the beginning, assuming economic imbalance will occur.
If you’re on the financially comfortable side, you need to be considerate and not exclude struggling companions. Conversely, if you become the struggling one, remember it’s a natural part of relationship dynamics.
It doesn’t diminish your value as a person.
In modern society, money talk is often taboo. But this proverb teaches us the importance of openly sharing economic situations and helping each other. Precisely because it’s a three-person relationship, compassion and understanding are essential.
Comments