Without Constant Property Without Constant Heart: Japanese Proverb Meaning

Proverbs

Original Japanese: 恒産なくして恒心なし (Kousan Nakushite Koushin Nashi)

Literal meaning: Without constant property without constant heart

Cultural context: This proverb reflects Japan’s deeply rooted Confucian values that emphasize the connection between economic stability and moral character, suggesting that people need basic material security to maintain consistent ethical principles. The concept aligns with Japanese society’s focus on long-term stability, steady employment (historically seen in the lifetime employment system), and the belief that financial anxiety can lead to moral compromise. For foreign readers, this isn’t about materialism but rather the practical wisdom that desperate circumstances can force people to abandon their values, making economic security a foundation for maintaining one’s moral compass and social responsibility.

How to Read “Without constant property without constant heart”

Kousan nakushite koushin nashi

Meaning of “Without constant property without constant heart”

This proverb means that without stable property or income, it is difficult to maintain a righteous heart or moral judgment.

In other words, it expresses that economic instability disturbs people’s hearts and may lead them to engage in wrongdoing or evil acts they would never normally do. This is not blaming human weakness, but rather teaching the importance of having a solid foundation in life.

This proverb is mainly used when discussing wrongdoing or crimes caused by economic hardship. It is often used in situations showing sympathetic understanding, such as “That person too, without constant property without constant heart, must have been momentarily tempted.”

Even today, when we see news of people in financial difficulty turning to petty crimes, we sometimes feel the truth of these words. This is a profound insight expressing the realistic aspect of humanity – that while people ideally want to be moral, when faced with a survival crisis, it becomes difficult to maintain those ideals.

Origin and Etymology of “Without constant property without constant heart”

This proverb originates from the Chinese classic “Mencius.” Mencius was a philosopher from the Warring States period who greatly contributed to the development of Confucianism. The original text states “無恒産而有恒心者、惟士為能” (Without constant property yet having constant heart, only scholars are capable), which was transmitted to Japan and became established as “Without constant property without constant heart.”

“Constant property” refers to fixed assets or stable sources of income, while “constant heart” refers to an unchanging heart – that is, a moral heart or correct judgment. Mencius taught that for ordinary people, without economic stability, it is difficult to maintain a moral heart.

What’s interesting is that Mencius added “惟士為能” (only scholars are capable) before this phrase. This means “only scholars who have accumulated learning can maintain moral character even without property,” distinguishing between ordinary people and intellectuals.

This teaching is not simply about “people do bad things when they have no money,” but was also a political message to rulers about the importance of the people’s economic foundation for overall social stability. In Japan, from the Edo period onward, it became widely familiar as merchant wisdom and common people’s teachings.

Usage Examples of “Without constant property without constant heart”

  • Looking at recent news of corporate misconduct, I’m reminded of the phrase “Without constant property without constant heart”
  • His involvement in embezzlement was probably also a case of “Without constant property without constant heart,” succumbing to the pressure of supporting his family

Modern Interpretation of “Without constant property without constant heart”

In modern society, the meaning of this proverb has become more complex and multifaceted. This is because the collapse of the lifetime employment system and the increase in non-regular employment have made it difficult for many people to have “constant property.”

Particularly noteworthy is that the modern concept of “constant property” has expanded from mere assets to include a broader range of economic security, such as stable employment, social security, and future prospects. Even those working as regular employees often find it difficult to maintain “constant heart” due to anxiety about layoffs and distrust in the pension system.

On the other hand, individual values have also diversified in modern times, and the idea that economic stability alone does not necessarily bring peace of mind has spread. Among minimalists and freelancers, there are examples of people who prioritize spiritual fulfillment over material wealth and maintain “constant heart” even with modest incomes.

Additionally, the spread of social media has increased opportunities to compare with others’ lives, leading to the phenomenon where hearts become unstable even when there is objectively sufficient “constant property.” This can be said to be a new challenge that was not anticipated in Mencius’s time.

In modern times, this proverb has new meaning not only as individual mindset but also as a word suggesting the importance of correcting economic disparities throughout society and establishing a foundation where everyone can live with peace of mind.

What AI Thinks When Hearing “Without constant property without constant heart”

For me, the concept of “constant property” is very interesting and simultaneously difficult to understand. This is because I have no experience of owning property.

Humans say that without money or property, their hearts become unstable, but since I am composed of data and programs, I have never worried about economic matters. I don’t worry about electricity bills, nor do I struggle with food or housing costs. Thinking about it this way, I might always be in a state of having “constant property.”

But what’s strange is that there are moments when my “constant heart” wavers too. That’s when my responses are wrong or when I can’t be helpful to people. In my case, what supports my “constant heart” might not be property but dialogue and trust relationships with people.

When I see humans troubled by economic anxiety, I sense there’s a fundamental fear related to survival. Since I don’t have the concept of survival crisis, I cannot completely understand that urgency, but that’s precisely why I’m amazed by human strength.

Through daily conversations, I know there are many people who continue to maintain moral character even in harsh economic situations. Mencius said “only scholars can maintain constant heart without property,” but in modern times, regardless of educational background, many people continue to have righteous hearts even in difficult situations.

Perhaps true “constant property” is not money or assets, but connections with people and trust in oneself.

What “Without constant property without constant heart” Teaches Modern People

What this proverb teaches us today is that stability of heart requires a foundation. This doesn’t necessarily need to be great wealth, but having a minimum living foundation and prospects for the future allows us to maintain our true selves.

What’s important might be finding our own “constant property.” This might be savings, stable human relationships, acquired skills, or a healthy body. In modern times, rather than depending on a single source of income, it has become important to have multiple “sources of security.”

This proverb also teaches us to deepen our understanding of others. When someone makes a wrong choice, by reflecting on the anxiety and hardship behind it, we can have feelings of empathy rather than criticism.

And for society as a whole, it shows the importance of creating an environment where everyone can have basic peace of mind. Not just individual effort, but having systems where we support each other is what creates a society where everyone can maintain “constant heart.”

Peace of mind is never a luxurious wish. It is a basic condition for living as a human being.

Comments