How to Read “Who will not when he may, when he will he shall have nay”
“Who will not when he may, when he will he shall have nay”
WHO will not when he MAY, when he WILL he shall have NAY
The word “nay” means “no” – it’s an old-fashioned way of saying someone will be refused.
Meaning of “Who will not when he may, when he will he shall have nay”
Simply put, this proverb means that if you refuse opportunities when they’re available, you’ll regret it later when those chances are gone.
The literal words paint a clear picture. “When he may” refers to times when someone has the chance to do something. “Will not” means they choose to refuse or delay. The second part warns what happens next. “When he will” means when they finally want to act. “Shall have nay” means they’ll face rejection or find the opportunity has disappeared.
This wisdom applies to countless situations today. Someone might delay applying for their dream job, only to find it filled later. A person could postpone learning a new skill, then struggle when that knowledge becomes essential. In relationships, people sometimes take others for granted until those relationships end. The pattern repeats across work, education, health, and personal growth.
What makes this insight powerful is how it captures human nature. We often assume good opportunities will wait for us. We delay action because we fear commitment or think something better might come along. This proverb reminds us that timing matters greatly. The world doesn’t pause while we make up our minds. Other people move forward, circumstances change, and windows of opportunity close.
Origin and Etymology
The exact origin of this proverb is unknown, though it appears in various forms throughout English literature. The archaic language suggests it emerged during the Middle English period, roughly between the 12th and 15th centuries. During this time, such sayings were commonly used to teach practical wisdom about seizing opportunities.
Medieval society placed great emphasis on timing and social obligations. People lived in rigid social structures where missing the right moment could have serious consequences. A farmer who delayed planting might face hunger. A merchant who hesitated on a trade deal might lose profits. These realities made timing-based wisdom especially valuable for survival and success.
The proverb spread through oral tradition before appearing in written collections of sayings. Like many old proverbs, it traveled through different regions and evolved slightly in wording while keeping its core message. The formal, rhythmic structure helped people remember it easily. Over centuries, it moved from everyday speech into literature and eventually into modern collections of traditional wisdom.
Interesting Facts
The word “nay” comes from Old Norse “nei,” meaning “no” or “not.” It was commonly used in Middle English but gradually replaced by “no” in everyday speech. Today, “nay” survives mainly in formal voting contexts and traditional sayings.
The proverb uses a balanced structure called chiasmus, where the second half mirrors the first half in reverse order. This creates a pleasing rhythm that makes the saying easier to remember and more impactful when spoken aloud.
Usage Examples
- Manager to employee: “You turned down the promotion last year, and now that position’s been eliminated – who will not when he may, when he will he shall have nay.”
- Mother to son: “You refused to apply for college when we offered to pay, and now we can’t afford it – who will not when he may, when he will he shall have nay.”
Universal Wisdom
This proverb reveals a fundamental tension in human psychology between our desire for security and our need for growth. We naturally want to keep our options open, believing this gives us control and safety. Yet this very tendency to delay and deliberate often costs us the opportunities we’re trying to protect.
The wisdom speaks to our relationship with time and uncertainty. Humans evolved to be cautious creatures, carefully weighing risks before acting. This served our ancestors well when facing physical dangers. However, in a world of opportunities rather than threats, excessive caution becomes a liability. We fear making the wrong choice so much that we end up making no choice at all, which is often the worst choice possible.
What makes this pattern so persistent is that it feels rational in the moment. Waiting seems like the smart move when we’re uncertain. We tell ourselves we need more information, better timing, or clearer circumstances. But opportunities exist precisely because they involve uncertainty and limited time. If everything were guaranteed and permanent, there would be no advantage to acting quickly. The proverb captures this paradox: the very qualities that make opportunities valuable also make them temporary. Understanding this helps explain why decisive action, even with incomplete information, often leads to better outcomes than endless deliberation.
When AI Hears This
When someone offers you something, you temporarily become the powerful one. You can say yes or no while they wait. But this power is actually borrowed, not owned. The person making the offer can take it back anytime. Most people don’t realize they’re just holding someone else’s decision temporarily.
Humans naturally think having choices means having control over the situation. They believe waiting gives them more power and better options later. This feeling tricks them into missing the real truth about timing. The other person was always in charge and just let them borrow some control for a while.
This borrowed power creates a beautiful trap that humans fall into repeatedly. They mistake temporary control for permanent advantage in almost every relationship. Yet this same mistake might actually help them sometimes by making them more careful. The illusion of power forces them to think harder about important decisions.
Lessons for Today
Living with this wisdom requires developing a different relationship with uncertainty and timing. Rather than seeking perfect conditions, we can learn to recognize when circumstances are “good enough” to move forward. This doesn’t mean being reckless, but understanding that some decisions improve through action rather than analysis. The key lies in distinguishing between opportunities that require immediate response and situations where patience serves us better.
In relationships and collaborations, this wisdom reminds us to value what we have while we have it. People often assume that others will always be available for connection, support, or partnership. But relationships require ongoing investment and attention. When we consistently postpone meaningful conversations, delay expressing appreciation, or take others’ presence for granted, we risk losing those connections entirely. The proverb suggests that engagement and gratitude work best as present-moment practices rather than future intentions.
At a broader level, this ancient insight speaks to how communities and societies function. Collective opportunities also have timing elements. Social movements, cultural shifts, and collaborative projects all have windows when participation matters most. Those who engage early often shape outcomes, while those who wait may find themselves excluded or irrelevant. The wisdom doesn’t demand that we chase every possibility, but rather that we recognize the temporary nature of most opportunities. This recognition can help us make more intentional choices about when to act and when to wait, based on our genuine priorities rather than fear or indecision.
Comments